Mississippi Department of
Education
Office of Federal Programs
Water Valley Schools/Davidson Elementary
FY 2012 Consolidated Federal
Programs Application

April 2011
Grant Period:
FY 2012 Consolidated
Federal Programs Application
Table of Contents
Table of Contents--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2
Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-4
Section I - Consolidated Plan
General Assurances ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 5-13
ESEA Goals and Indicators----------------------------------------------------------------- 14
Section II - Local Educational Agency
(LEA) Title I Plan
Title I Plan --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15-17
Title I, Part A, Parental Involvement------------------------------------------------ 18-20
Title I
Plan Budget Narrative------------------------------------------------------ 22-23
Title I,
Part A Neglected Activities and Expenditures------------------------- 24
Title II,
Part A
Title II Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting----------------------- 25-26
Transferability Authority Form ----------------------------------------------------- 27
Title I Budget Workbook (Excel
Spreadsheets)---------------- Under Separate Cover
(See Office of Federal Financial Management)
Mississippi
Department of Education
FY 2012 Consolidated
Federal Programs Application
I.
Introduction
Annually, the Mississippi Department of Education
(MDE) requires Local education agencies (LEA) receiving Title I funds to
submit, for approval, a consolidated application, as required by the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, SEC
1112. This document is designed to
help school districts properly utilize allocated federal dollars to positively impact
academic improvement by helping low-achieving children meet challenging
academic achievement standards in every school across the state. (Section 1001)
II.
Program Design
The FY 2012 Consolidated Federal Programs
Application (SY 2011-2012) is an electronic document comprised of four major
components: Consolidated Plan, Budgetary
Document, Schoolwide Plan Template, and Targeted Assistance Plan Template. LEAs are required to submit applicable
components, depending on the program design.
The four components are generally described below:
a.
Consolidated Plan – The Consolidated Plan is a Word
document that contains legal assurances and key federal program
data. This section is designed to
collect and evaluate areas of compliance for Titles I and II. LEAs must collect
and compile all data from local schools as it relates to each area
within this section.
b.
Budgetary Document – The Budgetary Document is an Excel file entitled “FY12 CFPA Budget.” This file contains eight (8) Excel
worksheets. The worksheets are pre-set
to automatically transfer data throughout the file. (i.e. When the LEA’s name is entered in cell
C2 of the “Cover Page,” the entered name will show automatically on all
worksheets.) Worksheets are designed
with specific instructions noted in comment boxes.
c.
Schoolwide Plan (SWP) Template – This template is an instrument used to aid in the
development of schoolwide plans to improve the academic success of all students.
d.
Targeted Assistance Plan Template –
This template is an instrument used to aid in the development of targeted
assistance plans to improve the academic success of identified eligible students.
III.
Pre-Award Cost
LEAs may incur pre-award costs for Title I Grants
to LEAs. Attachment B, paragraph 32 of
OMB Circular A-87 states that pre-award costs are allowable only to the extent
that they would have been allowable if incurred after the date of the
award. In the event that the Office of Federal
Programs makes a determination that an activity paid for by the LEA prior to
the date of the award was not allowable, then the LEA may not reimburse itself
for the cost of the activity.
IV.
Substantially Approvable Form
EDGAR Section 76.708(a) requires all state agencies
to substantially approve LEA plans
prior to LEA obligation of federal funds.
The MDE considers the submission of each LEA’s Consolidated Plan
and Budgetary Documents, based on the preliminary allocations, as substantially approvable when the MDE
staff has determined the LEA’s overall consolidated plan and detailed budget
are generally in compliance with allowable usage(s) of federal funds. The MDE staff will further ensure all
expenditures are supplemental in nature; however, the responsibility to ensure
all expenditures are supplemental remains with the LEA. Upon verification of compliance, an official
letter of approval, from the Office of Federal Programs granting spending
authority will be issued. Any
unallowable expenditures charged to Title funds will result in reimbursement
from LEA funds. Once final allocations
have been released, all LEAs are required to officially amend plans and budgets
in accordance to the Mississippi Department of Education’s Federal Programs
Amendment procedures. Schoolwide and
Targeted Assistance Plans will be submitted with verification of LEA approval
during each LEA’s full onsite monitoring visit.
V.
Submission Process
The FY 2012 Consolidated Federal Programs
Application (CFPA) is a comprehensive series of documents published by the
Mississippi Department of Education.
Documents are not to
be altered or changed in format. The FY11
CFPA must be received in the Office of Federal Programs on or before
Mississippi
Department of Education
Office of
Federal Programs
Attention:
Debbie B. Murphy
Section I: General Assurances
This Consolidated Federal
Programs Application (CFPA) is for Local Educational Agency (LEA) use in
requesting LEA funds for covered programs under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
Each question in the application is directed by the legislation, and the
parenthetical citation with each question indicates the section of legislation
that requires the item to be addressed in this application.
The legislative purpose of these federal funds is to improve teaching and learning to meet student needs effectively. Ongoing broad-based planning and shared decision-making are essential for quality programming. This CFPA supports Mississippi LEAs in looking at increasing student learning and achievement through effective programming, professional development, parent and community involvement, and provision of a safe, orderly climate conducive to our teachers teaching and our students learning.
LEA Statement of
Assurances
The School Board of Water Valley Schools approved
and recorded in its minutes the single set of assurances stated below at a
meeting held on May 16, 2011 and
further authorized the Superintendent to sign such single set of assurances as
required by Section 9306 and to submit an application to the Mississippi
Department of Education as required by Section 9305 to receive grants under
stated Titles of the No Child Left Behind
Act of 2001 and other applicable Federal programs. Please
note the school board approval of these assurances includes the Schoolwide
and/or Targeted Assistance Plan and Budget.
1. Programs and services are and will be in compliance with Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A statement of compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 should be filed with the Superintendent.
6.
When federal funds are made available, they will be
used to supplement and, to the extent practical, increase the amount of state
and local funds that would, in the absence of such federal funds, be made
available for the uses specified in the state plan, and in no case supplant
such state or local funds. Personnel,
contracts, materials, supplies, and equipment purchased with Consolidated
Program funds supplement the basic education program. (34
27. The LEA will:
28. The LEA annually uses the State academic assessments and other indicators described in the State Plan to review the progress of each school receiving Title I funds to determine whether the school is making adequate yearly progress. The LEA shall identify for program improvement any elementary or secondary school that fails for 2 consecutive years, to make adequate yearly progress as defined in the State’s plan. For schools that are targeted assistance, the LEA may choose to review the progress of only the students in the school who are served, or are eligible for services under this part before identifying the school for program improvement, corrective action or restructuring under Section 1116. For schools identified as program improvement, the LEA agrees to the following:
a. Year 1: Not later than the first day of the school year following identification, provide all students enrolled in the school with the option to transfer to another public school served by the LEA, which may include a public charter school, that has not been identified for program improvement. The LEA shall give priority to the lowest achieving children from low-income families. In addition, the LEA will:
i. assist the school in revising the school plan that shall cover a two-year period and will set aside 10% of school funds for teacher and principal professional development for the duration of the time the school is in program improvement;
ii. ensure provision of specified technical assistance during the development and implementation of the school plan.
b. Year 2: For a school that fails to make adequate yearly progress after the first year, the LEA shall continue to provide all students enrolled in the school with the option to transfer to another public school and shall make supplemental educational services available.
c. Year 3: For a school that fails to make adequately yearly progress after two years in program improvement, the LEA shall continue to provide all students enrolled in the school with the option to transfer to another public school; continue to provide supplemental services; and shall identify the school for corrective action and take at least one corrective action under clause (iv). The LEA shall publish and disseminate information regarding any corrective action taken. (Section 1116(b)(7)(c))
d. Year 4: For a school that after one year in corrective action fails to make adequate yearly progress, the LEA shall continue to provide all students enrolled in the school with the option to transfer to another public school in the district; continue to make supplemental services available; and shall prepare a plan for alternative governance arrangements for the school as indicated in Section 1116(b)(8)(B).
e. Year 5: For a school that after two years in corrective action fails to make adequate yearly progress, the LEA shall implement the alternative governance arrangement plan consistent with State law and with Section 1116(b)(8)(B).
For any case described for program improvement in years 1-4 above, the LEA shall provide or shall pay for the provision of transportation for the student to the public school the student attends. Unless a lesser amount is needed, the LEA shall spend an amount equal to 20% of its allocation under subpart 2 from which the agency shall spend:
i.
An amount equal to 5% to pay
for transportation costs;
ii.
An amount equal to 5% to
provide supplemental education services;
iii.
An amount equal to the
remaining 10% for transportation or supplemental services or both as the agency
determines.
In any case identified in years 1-4 above, if all public schools
served by the LEA to which a student may transfer are identified as program
improvement, the LEA shall to the extent practicable, establish a cooperative
agreement with other LEAs in the area for transfer.
If any school identified for program improvement makes adequate yearly progress
for two consecutive years, the LEA shall exit the school from program
improvement upon notification by the State and shall no longer subject the
school to the requirements of program improvement. (Section 1116(a)(1)(A),
§1116(b)(1)(A), §1116(b)(1)(E), §1116(b)(3)(A), §1116(b)(4)(A), §1116(b)(5),
§1116(b)(7)(C), §1116(b)(8)(A), §1116(b)(8)(B), §1116(b)(9), §1116(b)(10),
§1116(b)(11), §1116(b)(12))
29.
The LEA is maintaining fiscal efforts on behalf of
eligible children to ensure that these funds supplement the regular program and
not the local efforts to educate eligible children. (Section 6322(A), Section 1120(A)).
30. The LEA agrees to implement programs, activities, and procedures for the involvement of parents in programs assisted under and consistent with Title I Part A requirements. Such programs, activities, and procedures shall be planned and implemented with meaningful consultation with parents of participating children. Each LEA shall develop jointly with, agree on with, and distribute to parents of participating children, a written parental involvement policy. The policy shall be incorporated into the LEA local plan and describe how the LEA will:
a. Involve parents in the joint development of the local plan and the process of school review for program improvement schools under Section 1116;
b. Help schools to plan and implement effective parental involvement activities to improve student academic achievement and school performance;
c. Build the schools’ and parents’ capacity for strong parental involvement;
d. Coordinate and integrate parental involvement strategies under Part A and under other programs as specified;
e. Conduct with the involvement of parents, an annual evaluation of the content and effectiveness of the parental involvement policy and use the findings of the evaluation to design more effective parental involvement; and
f. Involve parents in the activities of the Title I schools.(Section 1118(a)(2))
32. To ensure effective involvement of parents each LEA shall provide:
33. The LEA may also involve parents in
activities as specified in Section 1118(e)(6)-(13). In carrying out the parental
involvement requirements the LEA, to the extent practicable, shall provide full
opportunities for the participation of parents with limited English
proficiency, parents of children with disabilities, and parents of migratory
children, including providing information and school reports required under
Section 1111 in format and, to the extent practicable, in a language such
parents understand. (Section 1118(f))
34.
No
later than the beginning of the 2002-2003 school year, the LEA will present in
an understandable and uniform format and language that the parents can
understand, the Annual LEA Report Cards. (Section
1111(h)(2))
35.
The
LEA shall provide high-quality professional development to enable teachers to
become highly qualified and successful classroom teachers. (Section
1119(a)(1)(B)) The LEA shall develop
strategies for providing professional development for paraprofessionals,
parents and other staff. (Section 1119(b-h))
36.
Each
LEA shall establish annual measurable objectives that include an annual increase
in the percentage of highly qualified teachers at each LEA and school, to
ensure that all teachers teaching in core academic subjects in each public
elementary and secondary school are highly qualified not later than the end of the
2005-2006 school year. The LEA shall annually increase the percentage of
teachers who are receiving high-quality professional development to enable such
teachers to become highly qualified and successful classroom teachers. The LEA may include such other measures as
the State educational
agency determines to be appropriate to increase teacher qualifications. (Section 1119(a)(2)(3))
37.
Classroom
teachers who are being assisted by instructional aides retain their
responsibility for the instruction and supervision of the pupils in their
charge.
38.
All
paraprofessionals hired after the date of enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and working in a program supported
with funds under Title I shall have: completed at least two years of study in
an institution of higher education; obtained an associate’s (or higher) degree; met a rigorous
standard of quality and can demonstrate, through a formal State or local
academic assessment; have knowledge of, and the ability to assist in
instructing, reading, writing, and mathematics; or instructing, reading
readiness, writing readiness, and mathematics readiness, as appropriate. The LEA shall ensure that all
paraprofessionals hired before the date of enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, and
working in a program supported with funds under this part shall, not later than
4 years after the date of enactment satisfy the requirements of subsection (c)
New Paraprofessionals. (Section 1119 (c) and (d))
39.
A
local education agency shall reserve such funds as are necessary under this
part to provide services comparable to those provided to children in schools
funded under this part to serve homeless children and children in local
institutions or community day school programs for neglected children. (Section 1113(c)(3)(A-C))
40.
The LEA has maintained fiscal effort - the combined
fiscal effort per student or the aggregate expenditures of the LEA from State
and local funds for free public education for the preceding year was not less
than 90 percent of the combined fiscal effort or aggregate expenditures for the
second preceding year. (20 U.S.C. §8891),
(PL 107-110, Title XIV. §14101 (10), and
§14501(a))
42. The school services an eligible school attendance area in which not less than 40 percent of the children are from low-income families. (Section 1114(b))
i.
Provide opportunities for all children to meet the State’s proficient
and advanced levels of student performance described in Section 1111(b)(1)(D).
ii.
Use effective methods of instructional strategies, that are based on
scientifically based research, that:
1.
strengthen the core academic program in the school;
2.
increase the amount and quality of learning time, such as providing an
extended school year and before- and after-school and summer programs and
opportunities, and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum; and
3.
include strategies for meeting the educational needs of historically
underserved populations;
4.
include strategies to address the needs of all children in the school,
but particularly the needs of low-achieving children and those at risk of not
meeting the State student academic achievement standards who are members of the
target population of any program that is included in the schoolwide program
which may include—
a.
counseling, pupil services, and mentoring services;
b. college and career awareness
and preparation, such as college and career guidance, personal finance
education, and innovative teaching methods, which may include applied learning
and team-teaching strategies; and
5.
the integration of vocational
and technical education; and address how the school will determine if such
needs have been met; and
a.
are consistent with, and are designed to implement, the State and local
improvement plans, if any. (Section
114(b)(1)(A) and (B))
46. A participating school in consultation with the LEA and its technical assistance provider shall develop a comprehensive plan for reforming the total instructional program in the school. (Section 1117)
47.
The
school maintains a schoolwide process of developing improvement plans that are
broadly reflective of the socio-economic composition of the school attendance
area, principals, teachers, other school personnel, parents, and members of the
community in the development of school improvement plans (including taking into
account the needs of migratory children as defined in section 1909(2)). The
school plan describes improvement efforts related to instruction, auxiliary
services, school environment, and organization. (Section 1114(b)(1))
The
LEA will:
51. Work in consultation with schools as the schools
develop the schools’ plans pursuant to section 1114 and assist schools as the
schools implement such plans or undertake activities pursuant to section 1115
so that each school can make adequate yearly progress (AYP) toward meeting the
State student academic achievement standards;
65.
LEAs need to satisfy the requirements of this section
and coordinate with the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act. (Section 1111(a)(1))
68.
LEAs will adopt policies and practices to ensure that
transportation is provided to homeless children and youths, at the request of
the parent or guardian, to and from the school of origin. (PL 107-110, §722 (g)(J)(iii))
69. The LEA shall, after timely and meaningful consultation with appropriate private school officials, provide to those children and their teachers or other educational personnel, on an equitable basis, special education services or other benefits that address their needs under the following programs:
70.
Educational services for private school children,
teachers and other educational personnel shall be equitable in comparison to
services and other benefits for public school children, teachers, and other
educational personnel participating in the program and shall be provided in a
timely manner. (PL 107-110, §9501(a)(3))
72. Title I services for private school students are on an equitable basis with public school students, taking into account the number of students served and the special educational needs of such students. The expenditures are equal to the per pupil expenditures of the public schools. (Section 1120(a))
77.
Title I services or other benefits, including materials
and equipment, shall be secular, neutral, and non-ideological. (Section 1120(a)(2))
78.
The LEA maintains and will provide upon request to the
State educational agency a written affirmation signed by officials of each
participating private school that the consultation required by Section 1120(b)
of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 has occurred. (Section 1120(b))
79. An
LEA, serves each student who has been identified for funding purposes from
80. The
needs of students are assessed upon enrollment and periodically thereafter, to
identify students at risk of failing to meet State standards. Assessment
results for students are on file at each participating site and/or custodial
agency. (Section 1112(b)(1), §1416,
§1431)
The
LEA will:
81. Target funds to schools within the jurisdiction
of the local educational agency that have the lowest proportion of highly
qualified teachers, have the largest average class size, or are identified for
school improvement under Section1116(b);
87. The LEA will use funds to meet the requirements contained in Title II, Part A, and all other applicable provisions of the ESEA Reauthorization of 2001 and will submit necessary documentation of compliance with requirements upon request. (Section 2121)
The
LEA will:
90. Use funds under this subpart (Title IV, Part A)
to increase the level of State, local, and other non-Federal funds that would,
in the absence of funds under this subpart, be made available for programs and
activities authorized under this subpart, and in no case supplant such State,
local, and other non-Federal funds.
91. That
the LEA is in compliance with the State law required by subsection (b)
107. requiring LEAs to expel from school for a period of not less than 1
year a student who is determined to have brought a firearm to a school, or to
have possessed a firearm at a school, under the jurisdiction of LEAs in that
State, except that such State law shall allow the chief administering officer
of an LEA to modify such expulsion requirement for a student on a case-by-case
basis if such modification is in writing.
(Section 4141(b)(1))
The following
people have read the above assurances and will adhere to them for the
implementation of the federal programs included in this application. The signatures below indicate approval of the
expenditures and assurances described, including the budget pages:
Required Signatures:
Dr, Deborah Moran May 16,
2011 dmoran@wvsd.k12.ms.us
Superintendent
(Typed Name and Signature) Date E-mail address
Lamar Burgress
LEA
Board President (Typed Name and Signature) Date E-mail address
Trey Allman
Title
I Director/Coordinator (Typed Name and Signature) Date E-mail address
Accountability,
especially as it is reflected in student achievement results, drives the
consolidated application’s contents. The
following Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) performance goals and
indicators cut across the ESEA programs included in the application and reflect
the key No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 goal of improved
achievement for all students.
The Mississippi Department of Education adopts the following five goals and the corresponding indicators and agrees to submit targets and baseline data related to the goals and indicators identified in the application. The Mississippi Department of Education must report performance targets for each indicator and baseline data for the targets to the United States Department of Education (USDE) as a part of the Consolidated State Performance Report. Please see U.S. Department of Education Accountability Workbook: Mississippi Reading/Language Arts (page 27) and Mathematics (page 29) for Annual Measureable Objectives.
|
Performance Goals and Indicators |
|
Performance Goal 1: By 2013-2014, all students
will reach high standards, at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in
reading/language arts and mathematics. |
|
1.1
Performance Indicator: The percentage of
students, in the aggregate and for each subgroup, who are at or above the
proficient level in reading/language arts on the State’s assessment. (Note: These subgroups are those for which
the ESEA requires State reporting, as identified in Section
1111(h)(1)(C)(i).) |
|
1.2 Performance Indicator: The percentage of students, in the aggregate and
in each subgroup, who are at or above the proficient level in mathematics on
the State’s assessment. (Note: These
subgroups are those for which the ESEA requires State reporting, as
identified in Section 1111(h)(1)(C)(i).) |
|
1.3
Performance Indicator: The percentage of Title I
schools that make adequate yearly progress. |
|
Performance Goal 2: All limited English
proficient students will become proficient in English and reach high academic
standards, at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in reading/language
arts and mathematics. |
|
2.1
Performance Indicator: The percentage of limited English
proficient students, determined by cohort, who have attained English
proficiency by the end of the school year.
|
|
2.2
Performance Indicator: The percentage of limited English proficient
students who are at or above the proficient level in reading/language arts on
the State’s assessment, as reported for performance indicator 1.1. |
|
2.3
Performance Indicator: The percentage of limited
English proficient students who are at or above the proficient level in
mathematics on the State’s assessment, as reported for performance indicator
1.2. |
|
Performance Goal 3: By 2005-2006, all
students will be taught by highly qualified teachers. |
|
3.1
Performance Indicator: The percentage of classes being taught by
“highly qualified” teachers (as the term is defined in section 9101(23) of
the ESEA), in the aggregate and in “high-poverty” schools (as the term is
defined in section 1111(h)(1)(C)(viii) of the ESEA). |
|
3.2
Performance
Indicator: The percentage of teachers receiving high-quality professional
development (as the term,
“professional development,” is defined in Section 9101(34) of the ESEA). |
|
3.3
Performance
Indicator: The percentage of paraprofessionals (excluding those with sole
duties as translators and parental involvement assistants) who are
qualified. (See criteria in Section
1119(c) and (d).) |
|
Performance Goal 4: All students will be
educated in learning environments that are safe, drug free, and conducive to
learning. |
|
4.1
Performance Indicator: The number of
persistently dangerous schools, as defined by the State. |
|
Performance Goal 5: All students will
graduate from high school. |
|
5.1
Performance Indicator: The percentage of
students who graduate from high school each year with a regular diploma,
--disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender, disability status, migrant
status, English proficiency, and status as economically disadvantaged. |
|
5.2
Performance Indicator: The percentage of
students who drop out of school, --disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender,
disability status, migrant status, English proficiency, and status as
economically disadvantaged. |
Section II: Local Education Agency (LEA) Title I Plan
|
The descriptions should be specific and written in
a manner that the users of the plan (LEA and school personnel, parents, as
well as MDE and federal monitors) are able to understand, implement, and
monitor the LEA’s Title I plan. |
A.
Describe student
academic assessments, if any, that are in addition to the state required
academic assessments used: (Section 1112(b)(1)(A)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv))
A.1 to determine the success of children in meeting
the State student academic achievement standards, and to provide progress
toward meeting the State student standards;
Universal Screening for math, reading, and language will be conducted
three times each year in K-8. Instruments used for these assessments will
include: The Dynamic Indicators of Basic
Early Literacy Skill (DIBELS), MAPS (Measurement of Academic Progress), and
Star Reader, My Reading Coach, Symphony Math, assessments in addition to
curriculum diagnostic tools provided by Envision
Math Assessment by Scott Foresman
A.2 to assist in diagnosis, teaching, and learning
in the classroom in ways that best enable low-achieving students served with
Title I, Part A funds to meet State student achievement academic standards and do well in the local
curriculum;
Teachers
used universal screener
A.3 to determine what revisions are needed to
projects funded with Title I, Part A funds so that children meet the State
student academic achievement standards; and
Principals, TST, and other administrative
staff review and share data with teachers bi-monthly. Revisions to Schoolwide
plan will be made based on data collected as well as adjustments to
instructional strategies.
A.4 to identify students who may be at risk for
reading failure or who are having difficulty reading, through the use of
screening, diagnostic, and classroom-based instructional reading assessments.
At risk students (k-6) receive computer individual
based instruction once identified. My
Reading Coach is one program that is used. FLRT is a program specifically
used to improve fluency. Universal Screening for reading and language
will be conducted three times each year in K-6. Instruments used for these
assessments will include: The Dynamic
Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skill (DIBELS) and MAPS 2nd
through 6th grade.
Assessment results will be reviewed monthly by
principals and teachers.. Adjustments to instruction will be made based on
data.
B.
Describe
how additional educational assistance will be provided to individual students
assessed as needing help in meeting the State standards. (Section
1112(b)(1)(C))
Dropout rate and the promotion/retention rate will be used to evaluate
effectiveness of programs.
Tutoring during school day will be provided
to students identified as in need, through MCT II scores and universal
screeners. Highly qualified staff will
provide instruction. Strategies include one on one, small group, and computer
assisted software programs. Communication with parents will be include parent
conferences and written progress reports.
C.
Describe
how the district will coordinate programs under Title I, Part A and Title II to
provide professional development for teachers and principals, and if
appropriate, pupil services personnel, administrators, parents, and other
staff, including local LEA level staff.
(Sections 1118 & 1119) (Section 1112(b)(1)(D))
·
All Title
II funds are used to hire additional teachers to reduce class size. All
administrators, pupil services personnel, and assistant teachers are highly
qualified.
·
A school
wide planning team which includes Federal Programs Dir., SPED Director,
Curriculum Coordinator, Principals, teachers, parents, and community members,
will meet annually. The meetings will occur in March or April. Data including
needs assessment survey results from staff, parents, and students will be studied.
MSIS printout on “highly qualified” teachers will be reviewed. MCT II results
will be reviewed to identify areas of improvement.
·
This
group will draft (revise and update) a professional development plan. After time allowed for any revisions, the
plan will be sent to the Superintendent for approval. It is a living document, though, and may be
revised by the professional development team at any time if a need is
indicated.
·
Federal
funds will be used to pay JBHM to provide training to teachers and administrators.
Training objectives include: common core, classroom management, bullying,
grading, and lesson plans.
·
State,
local and federal funds will support professional development. 5% of the total
Title I Budget will be spent for professional development.
D.
Describe
how the district will coordinate and integrate services provided
with other educational services such as:
D.1 Even Start, Head Start and other preschool
programs, including plans for the transition of participants in such programs
to local elementary school programs; and
·
Each year
·
Parents
of children in Head Start, Baptist pre K program, and other community pre k
programs as well as staff will provided Parental Involvement information by our
counselor. Schedules of Title and parental involvement meetings will be
provided.
·
The pre k
programs will have access to materials in the
·
Preregistration
is conducted in the spring for incoming students and parents. The school
counselor contacts Head Start and other private preschool agencies to inform
the parents of the registration date. Registration provides parents with the
opportunity to ask questions and tour school.
D.2 Services for children with limited English
proficiency, children with disabilities, migratory children, neglected or
delinquent youth, Indian children, homeless children, and immigrant children in
order to increase program effectiveness, eliminate duplication, and reduce fragmentation
of the instructional program.
·
Each year, parents/guardians of all new students enrolled in the
district are a given Home Language Survey, Homeless Survey, and Migrant Survey.
Living conditions for some students within the district may change during the
year. Homeless surveys will be updated throughout they year to identify status
change students.
·
MMESC (
·
Students
identified as Indian, will receive the same services provided to all other
students to insure their highest level of academic achievement.
·
The
·
If
special education students need services beyond those provided by IDEA, Title I
funds are used to provide unduplicated, additional services.
·
Neglected
youth at Reedy Acres are provided funds off the top of the Title I Budget to
assure that they have the opportunity to be as successful as other students.
E.
Describe the poverty
criteria that will be used to select school attendance areas by indicating the
source of data and the method of collection.
If school(s) eligible for services are bypassed then, they must submit
along with the CFPA, documentation that meets the requirements of Section 1113(b)(1)(D)(i)(ii)(iii).
The March Free/Reduced lunch count is used to determine eligible schools.
Because
F.
Describe
the schoolwide and/or targeted assistance programs to be conducted in the LEA’s
schools and where appropriate, educational services outside such schools for
children living in local institutions for neglected or delinquent children and
for neglected and delinquent children in community day school programs. (Section 1112(b)(1)(H)and (I)) and (Sections 1114 & 1115)
Title I,
Part A funds are set aside for Baptist Children’s Village (Reedy Acres). These
funds provide tutoring, supplies and materials. The materials include daily
school supplies, technology, learning software, and fees the students may be
required to pay.
G.
Describe how
the district will ensure that migratory children and formerly migratory
children who are eligible to receive services are selected to receive such
services on the same basis as other children who are selected to receive
services under Title I. (Section
1112(b)(1)(J))
At the beginning of the school year parents
and students are surveyed to identify migratory children. Water Valley Schools
uses a survey supplied by Mississippi Migrant
Education Service Center (NMESC). Water Valley Schools’ Migrant Policy and
Procedures guides’ district programs to insure migrant student needs’ are met. Once students are identified as
migrant MS State University will be contacted.
H.
Describe how the LEA will use
funds under Title I to support preschool programs such as Head Start and Even
Start (if appropriate). (Section
112(b)(1)(K))
No federal funds are used. However, Davidson Elementary counselor and
SPED Director coordinates activities.
____ Davidson Elementary works
collaboratively with local pre-school providers (First Steps, Head Start,
Professionals, Morning Glory, and First Baptist Daycare) to offer transition
services to all students entering the kindergarten program. Pre-kindergarten students
who are referred are screened using the Battelle Developmental Screening
Inventory II to identify students who are not adequately prepared to begin
kindergarten. Students who qualify for
services participate in intensive remediation classes provided by the Special
Education Department at
I.
Describe
actions the LEA will take to assist its low-achieving schools identified under
Section 1116 as in need of improvement. (Section 1112(b)(1)(L))
No Title I schools have been identified as in need of improvement.
J.
Describe
how the LEA plans to implement, if necessary, public school choice and
supplemental education services (SES). (Section
1112(b)(1)(M))
N/A Davidson Elementary is the only elementary Title
school in the
K.
Describe
the steps the LEA has taken or will take to ensure that all teachers and paraprofessionals
are highly qualified. (Section 1119)and
(Section 1112(b)(1)(N))
All teachers at the
High Quality professional development will be provided for
administrators, teachers, paraprofessionals, student services personnel and
parents based on needs assessment surveys conducted during spring semester.
Activities will develop instructional practices that help students meet state
content standards and obtain high achievement in academic areas. District staff
will be allowed to attend training sessions provided by the
L.
Describe your
LEA’s policy on how it will provide services to homeless children including
funds reserved to provide services comparable to homeless children who do not
attend participating Title I schools including related support services to
children in shelters and other locations where children may live.
(Section 1112(b)(1)(O)) (1113(c)(3)(A))
Surveys taken at the beginning of school have not identified any youths
that qualify as homeless. However, the
New students are surveyed when enrolling. Students are also surveyed
throughout the year by district staff to identify students whose living
arrangements change during the school year because of economic hardship, family
disruption, or destruction of home. No students are currently identified as
homeless. $100.00 is reserved for future identified homeless at
M.
Describe
how the LEA uses funds under Title I to support after school, before school,
and summer school programs. (Section
1112(b)(1)(Q))
The
The
salary/benefits for 6 teachers will be paid for with title funds as well as
supplies and materials.
N.
Describe
the identified needs, including the baseline data, which will be addressed through
Title I, Part A funds.
Math is an area identified as a need for improvement based on analysis
data from MCT 2.
Comparison 2008, 2009, and 2010 MCT 2 Mathematics
Scores
Mean Scale Score
|
Grade |
Davidson Elem. 2008 |
State 2008 |
Davidson Elem. 2009 |
State 2009 |
Davidson Elem. 2010 |
State 2010 |
|
3rd |
152 |
149 |
155 |
151 |
152 |
152 |
|
4th |
150 |
149 |
150 |
151 |
151 |
151 |
|
5th |
149 |
148 |
151 |
150 |
150 |
151 |
|
6th |
150 |
148 |
153 |
150 |
154 |
150 |
Performance Levels by Grade
|
Grade |
# Tested 2008 |
# Tested 2009 |
# Tested 2010 |
Adv 2008 |
Adv 2009 |
Adv 2010 |
Prof 2008 |
Prof 2009 |
Prof 2010 |
Basic
2008 |
Basic 2009 |
Basic 2010 |
Minim 2008 |
Minim2009 |
Minim 2010 |
|
3rd |
100 |
105 |
101 |
11/11% |
23/22% |
9/9% |
51/51% |
49/47% |
34/34% |
30/30% |
30/29% |
43/43% |
8/8 |
3/3% |
15/15 |
|
4th |
105 |
93 |
97 |
13/12% |
3/3% |
9/9% |
41/39% |
52/56% |
47/48% |
38/36% |
29/31% |
29/30% |
13/12% |
9/10% |
12/12% |
|
5th |
99 |
107 |
94 |
5/5% |
8/7% |
7/7% |
39/39% |
56/52% |
51/54% |
27/25% |
27/25% |
24/26% |
10/10% |
16/15% |
12/13% |
|
6th |
97 |
93 |
101 |
5/5% |
14/15% |
19/19 |
47/48% |
51/55% |
53/52% |
20/22% |
20/22% |
20/20% |
9/9% |
8/9% |
9/9% |
Competencies by Grade Average # Correct/Total Possible
Points
|
|
3rd 2008 |
3rd 2009 |
3rd 2010 |
4th 2008 |
4th 2009 |
4th 2010 |
5th 2008 |
5th 2009 |
5th 2010 |
6th 2008 |
6th 2009 |
6th 2010 |
Total 2008 |
Per Cent 2008 |
Total 2009 |
Per Cent 2009 |
Total 2010 |
Per Cent 2010 |
|
|
Number & Operations |
13.1/17 |
13.2/17 |
12.7/17 |
9.8/16 |
8.7/16 |
10.2/16 |
9.2/15 |
9.9/15 |
10.4/15 |
9.6/15 |
8.8/15 |
9.1/15 |
41.7/63 |
66.1% |
40.6/63 |
64.4% |
42.4/63 |
67.3 |
|
|
Algebra |
6/7 |
5.5/7 |
4.6/7 |
4.6/7 |
5.2/7 |
4.8/7 |
4.8/8 |
5.2/8 |
4.4/8 |
5.8/9 |
6.7/10 |
6.2/10 |
21.2/32 |
66.2% |
22.6/32 |
70.6% |
20/32 |
62.5 |
|
|
Geometry |
5.3/7 |
5.6/7 |
5.7/7 |
4.9/7 |
5/7 |
4.9/7 |
6.6/10 |
6.1/10 |
6.4/10 |
6.1/9 |
6.9/9 |
6.3/9 |
22.9/33 |
69.3% |
23.6/33 |
71.5% |
23.3/33 |
70.6 |
|
|
Measurement |
5.4/6 |
5.3/7 |
4.9/7 |
5.5/8 |
5.3/8 |
5.0/8 |
5.3/9 |
5/9 |
3.9/9 |
4.4/8 |
4.7/8 |
5.4/8 |
20.6/31 |
66.4% |
20.3/32 |
63.4% |
19.2/32 |
60 |
|
|
Data Analysis &
Probability |
5.1/7 |
5/7 |
4.5/7 |
5.1/7 |
4.8/7 |
4.3/7 |
4.9/8 |
4.6/8 |
4.3/8 |
5.4/8 |
5.7/8 |
5.4/8 |
20.5/30 |
68.3% |
15.1/30 |
50.3% |
18.5/30 |
61.7 |
|
|
Total Score |
34.9/44 |
35.3/45 |
31.8/45 |
29.9/45 |
29/45 |
29.2/45 |
30.8/50 |
30.8/50 |
29.4/50 |
31.3/49 |
32.8/50 |
32.4/50 |
126.9/189 |
64.3% |
122.2/19 |
64.3% |
123.4/190 |
64.9 |
|
|
Total % |
79.3 |
78.4 |
70.7 |
66.4 |
64.4 |
64.8 |
61.6 |
61.6 |
58.8 |
63.8 |
65.6 |
64.8 |
67.1 |
|
64.3 |
|
64.9% |
64.9 |
|
MCT 2 COMPARISON CHART LANGUAGE ARTS :
2008, 2009, 2010
Mean Scale Score Language Arts
Davidson Elementary to State
|
Grade |
DES 2008 |
State 2008 |
DES 2009 |
State 2009 |
DES 2010 |
STATE 2010 |
|
3rd |
152 |
149 |
150 |
149 |
148 |
149 |
|
4th |
150 |
149 |
151 |
149 |
151 |
150 |
|
5th |
149 |
148 |
149 |
149 |
150 |
149 |
|
6th |
150 |
148 |
151 |
149 |
153 |
149 |
Comparison of Performance Level Competencies by Grade
|
|
# Tested 2008 |
# Tested 2009 |
# Tested 2010 |
Advan 2008 |
Advan 2009 |
Advan 2010 |
Prof 2008 |
Prof 2009 |
Prof 2010 |
Basic 2008 |
Basic 2009 |
Basic 2010 |
Minim 2008 |
Minim 2009 |
Minim 2010 |
|
3rd |
100 |
105 |
101 |
11/11% |
14/13% |
9/9% |
51/51% |
41/39% |
34/34% |
30/30% |
34/32% |
43/43% |
8/8% |
16/15% |
15/15% |
|
4th |
105 |
93 |
97 |
13/12% |
9/10% |
17/18% |
41/39% |
41/44% |
43/44% |
38/36% |
38/41% |
30/31% |
13/12% |
5/5% |
7/7% |
|
5th |
99 |
109 |
94 |
5/5% |
8/7% |
7/7% |
39/39% |
45/41% |
48/51% |
45/45% |
39/39% |
33/35% |
10/10% |
13/12% |
6/6% |
|
6th |
97 |
93 |
101 |
5/5% |
6/6% |
8/8% |
47/48% |
55/59% |
62/61% |
36/37% |
26/28% |
23/23% |
9/9% |
6/6% |
8/8% |
Competencies: Average # Correct/Total Points Possible
|
|
3rd 2008 |
3rd 2009 |
3rd 2010 |
4th 2008 |
4th 2009 |
4th 2010 |
5th 2008 |
5th 2009 |
5th 2010 |
6th 2008 |
6th 2009 |
6th 2010 |
Total 2008 |
Percent 2008 |
Total 2009 |
Percent 2009 |
Total 2010 |
Percent 2010 |
|
Vocabulary |
6.2/8 |
5.9/8 |
5/8 |
4.8/8 |
4.2/8 |
4.4/8 |
5.6/8 |
5.5/8 |
4.9/8 |
4.7/8 |
5.1/8 |
4.5/8 |
21.3/32 |
66.5% |
20.7/32 |
64.6% |
18.8/32 |
58.8% |
|
|
11.4/17 |
10.1/17 |
9.8/17 |
11/17 |
11.5/17 |
10/17 |
13.1/22 |
13.2/22 |
12.1/22 |
11.1/21 |
11.4/22 |
11.4/22 |
48.6/78 |
63.1% |
46.2/78 |
59.2% |
43.3/78 |
55.5% |
|
Writing |
8.1/13 |
7/12 |
6.6/12 |
7.4/13 |
7.1/13 |
7.4/13 |
7.8/15 |
8/16 |
9.1/16 |
10/16 |
10.9/16 |
9.9/16 |
33.3/57 |
58.4% |
33/57 |
57.9% |
33/57 |
57.9% |
|
Grammar |
8.2/12 |
9.1/13 |
7.8/13 |
5.7/12 |
5.9/12 |
6.1/12 |
7.1/14 |
6.9/14 |
7.1/14 |
5.5/14 |
6.4/14 |
8.4/14 |
26.5/52 |
50.9% |
28.3/53 |
53.4% |
29.4/53 |
55.5% |
|
Total Score |
32.1/50 |
32.1/50 |
29.2/50 |
28.7/50 |
28.7/50 |
27.9/50 |
33.6/59 |
33.6/60 |
33.2/60 |
31.3/59 |
33.8/60 |
34.2/60 |
128.2/220 |
58.2% |
128.2/220 |
58.3% |
124.5/220 |
56.6% |
|
Total % |
64.2% |
64.2% |
58.4% |
57.4% |
57.4% |
55.8% |
56.9% |
56% |
55.3% |
53% |
56.3 |
57% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
PERCENTAGE SCORES BY GRADE LEVEL
|
|
3rd Grade 2008 % |
3rd 2009 % |
3rd 2010 % |
4th Grade 2008 |
4th Grade 2009 % |
4th Grade
2010 % |
5th Grade 2008 % |
5th Grade 2009 % |
5th Grade 2010 % |
|||||||||
|
Vocab |
6.2/8 |
77.5 |
5.9/8 |
73.8 |
5/ 8 |
62.5 |
4.8/8 |
60 |
4.2/8 |
52.5 |
4.4/8 |
55 |
5.6/8 |
70 |
5.5/8 |
68.8 |
4.9/8 |
61.2 |
|
|
11.4/17 |
67 |
10.1/17 |
59.4 |
9.8/17 |
57.6 |
11/ 17 |
64.7 |
11.5/17 |
67.6 |
10/17 |
58.8 |
13.1/22 |
59.5 |
13.2/22 |
60 |
12.1/22 |
55 |
|
Writing |
8.1/13 |
62.3 |
7/ 12 |
58.3 |
6.6/12 |
55 |
7.4/13 |
59.9 |
7.1/13 |
54.6 |
7.4/13 |
56.9 |
7.8/15 |
52 |
8/16 |
50 |
9.1/16 |
56.9 |
|
Grammar |
8.2/12 |
68.3 |
9.1/13 |
70 |
7.8/13 |
60 |
5.7/12 |
47.5 |
5.9/12 |
49.1 |
6.1/12 |
50.8 |
7.1/14 |
50.7 |
6.9/14 |
49.3 |
7.1/14 |
50.7 |
|
|
O. Describe the strategies and/or actions for meeting each identified performance goal and indicator that the LEA will be using with Title I, Part A funds. Fund usage will be driven by identified needs.
According to the results of the Parent Needs Assessment and the Teacher Needs Assessment from the previous school year (2009-10) math is an area that is important for student achievement. The success of children served with Title I, Part A funds in meeting the state standards are determined by analyzing third through sixth grade MCT 2 score reports in mathematics. These results are used to determine if students’ growth residual was met and identify those students who were proficient or advanced in mathematics. Those students identified as not meeting the state standards are scheduled to receive additional services through after school tutoring and small group/one T on one instruction by certified personnel.
The results from these tests are sent home with every child. Parents receive an AYP Report Card and these results are discussed with parents during Title I events, parent conferences and upon parent request.
Other formative assessments are used
to compile reports that are used to assist building level administrators and
teachers in monitoring student progress toward state standards. Scientific research-based program reports
from
Title I, Part A - Parental
Involvement
|
Must be fully completed. |
1. An LEA must reserve
funds for parental involvement activities for parents of private school
children who participate in Title I, Part A activities from the amount the LEA
has reserved for parental involvement.
These funds must be reserved by the LEA before any allocation of funds
to its respective school attendance areas and schools. The amount of funds reserved for these
activities must be proportionate to the number of private school children from
low-income families residing in participating public school attendance
areas. Please describe the process used to determine the set aside amount for private schools, if applicable. (Sections
200.65 and 200.77 of the Title I Regulations)
N/A Reserved funds are less than $5,000
2. Section 1118(a)(3)(A) requires an
LEA to reserve not less than one percent of its Title I, Part A allocation to
carry out parental involvement programs, activities, and procedures. This
requirement does not apply if one percent of such allocation is $5,000 or
less. Section 1118(a)(3)(B) requires
LEAs to involve parents in the decisions regarding how funds reserved under
Section 1118(a)(3)(A) are allotted for parental involvement activities. Describe
how the school has involved parents in the decisions regarding how funds
reserved under Section 1118(a)(3)(A) are allotted for parental involvement
activities.
·
Although one percent of
the Title I allocation is less than $5,000, the district ensures that parental
involvement programs, activities and procedures are in place. The district
makes every effort to involve parents in the decision making process of their
child’s educational program. As a part of a comprehensive needs assessment
parent surveys are conducted each year. Parent involvement meetings are
conducted annually. A public hearing is conducted prior to the Title I plan
submission for comments and suggestions. Information is disseminated to parents
in a number of ways: parent letter, newspaper, parent training, delayed
broadcast on local cable TV and postings on the district web site.
·
The superintendent along
with the building principal, federal programs director, district test
coordinator, and guidance counselor will conduct a meeting for parents and the
community. Topics of discussion will include state academic content standards,
state student achievement standards, and state and local academic assessments.
Staff will discuss funding procedures and learning strategies within the
Davidson Elementary Schoolwide Plan and CFPA with parents and community
members.
·
The district
professional development plan provides training for administrators, teachers,
teacher assistants, and pupil service personnel to help staff develop skills
that improve communication to parents and community members. Emphasis is placed
on making parents feel as if they are partners in the educational process.
Water Valley Schools will build trust through transparency.
·
Two parent/teacher
conference days are scheduled each year from
·
Davidson Elementary
provides a number of ways parents can volunteer: listen to students read, read
to students, practice math facts, after school programs, fund raising events,
and planning committees.
·
All information sent to
parents will be provided in a language that is direct and easily
understandable.
3. Please describe the strategies and programs the LEA uses to implement effective parental involvement in programs
assisted under Title I, Part A as required in Section 1118. (Attach a copy of the LEA’s Parental Involvement Policy)
Davidson Elementary Parental Involvement Policy
·
The
district ensures that parental involvement programs, activities and procedures
are in place. The
district makes every effort to involve parents in the decision making process
of their child’s educational program. As a part of a comprehensive needs
assessment parent surveys are conducted periodically. Parent involvement
meetings are conducted monthly. A public hearing is conducted prior to the
Title I plan submission for comments and suggestions. Information is
disseminated to parent in a number of ways: parent letter, newspaper, PTO,
parent training, delayed broadcast on local cable TV and postings on the
district web site.
·
Parents provide input through surveys and needs
assessment. Parents are also placed on committees that develop learning plans
and strategies. Parents participate in all Federal Programs meetings to help
determine how funds will be spent. Parents are invited to provide input
throughout the school year.
·
The superintendent along with the building
principal, federal programs director, district test coordinator, and guidance
counselor will conduct a meeting for parents and the community. Topics of
discussion will include state academic content standards, state student
achievement standards, and state and local academic assessments. Staff will
discuss funding procedures and learning strategies within the Davidson
Elementary Schoolwide Plan and CFPA with parents and community members.
·
The district professional development plan
provides training for administrators, teachers, teacher assistants, and pupil
service personnel to help staff develop skills that improve communication to
parents and community members. Emphasis is placed on making parents feel as if
they are partners in the educational process. Water Valley Schools will build
trust through transparency.
·
Two parent/teacher conference days are scheduled
each year from
·
Open House is scheduled at the beginning of the
school year to provide parents with the opportunity to communicate with school officials.
·
Davidson Elementary provides a number of ways
parents can volunteer: listen to students read, read to students, practice math
facts, after school programs, fund raising events, and planning committees.
·
“Parent Breakfast” is time provide during the
first nine weeks that allows parents to come for breakfast at Davidson
Elementary. During this time parents are given the opportunity to communicate
with teachers about academic expectations. Learning tips are provided to help
parents help their child.
·
All information sent to parents will be provided
in a language that is direct and easily understandable.
·
Parents receive “Parent Teacher Connection
Newsletter” monthly. The newsletter assists parents with nutrition information,
study tips, and reading strategies to help their children.
·
Parents with children enrolled in HeadStart and
other pre k programs in our area will be invited to participate in parental
involvement planning. These parents are provided information concerning future
meetings and other areas of participation.
Title I, Part A - Parental Involvement
Entire Reserved Amount
To be completed by LEAs who have private
schools and/or reserve over the obligated 1%
Name of LEA_Water
Entire Reserved Amount ____0___________________________________________________
(See
Reservation of Funds Worksheet item 4 column 4)
Section 1118(a)(3)(C) of E
|
|
Proposed
Activities |
Description of Activity |
Amount of Reservation |
|
Private Reservation |
Parental Involvement Activities for Private School Children |
|
|
|
Other Proposed Activities |
|
||
|
LEA Level Parental Involvement |
LEA Parental Involvement Activities |
|
|
|
Family Literacy and Parenting Skills |
|
||
|
Parental Involvement Activities for School Improvement (only
for LEA with schools that have been identified for improvement) |
|
|
|
|
95% of 1% Allocated to Schools |
|
|
|
|
Other Proposed Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
Other Proposed Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
Other Proposed Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
Other Proposed Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
Total |
Must equal entire
Title I, Part A Parental Involvement reservation: |
0.00 |
|
Title I, Part A - Parental Involvement
1% Reservation Only
To be completed by ALL LEAs
Name of LEA _Davidson Elementary_____________________________
LEA 1% Obligation_____0_____________________________________________________
(See Reservation of Funds Worksheet item 4 column 4)
LEA 1% Obligation less Private School Portion___________________________________
Public Schools’ Portion: ____________________________
This amount
must be 95% of the LEAs obligated (1%) reservation.
LEAs’ Portion:
___________________________________
This amount may be 5% of the LEAs obligated (1%) reservation.
Section 1118(a)(3)(C) of E
|
|
Proposed
Activities |
Description of
activity |
Amount of Reservation |
|
LEAs Portion up to 5% |
LEA Parental Involvement Activities |
|
|
|
Other Proposed Activities |
|
||
|
Schools Portion 95% |
Family Literacy and Parenting Skills |
|
|
|
Parental Involvement Activities for School Improvement (only for LEA with schools that have been identified for improvement) |
|
|
|
|
95% of 1% Allocated to Schools |
|
|
|
|
Other Proposed Activities |
|
|
|
|
Other Proposed Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Proposed Activities |
|
|
|
|
Other Proposed Activities |
|
|
|
Total |
Must equal Title I, Part A Parental Involvement 1% reservation
obligation: |
0.00 |
|
Private/non-public School Participation
Section 1120(b) of the No Child Left Behind Act and Section 200.63 of the Tile I
regulations require that timely and meaningful consultation occur between the
local education agency (LEA) and private school officials prior to any
decisions that affect the opportunities of eligible private school children,
teachers, and other educational personnel to participate in programs under this
Act. In addition, LEAs shall continue consultation throughout the
implementation and assessment of activities under this section. This form should be completed by the public
school officials and presented to private/non-public school officials for
documenting Timely and Meaningful
Consultation. The private school
administrator is required to sign this form. The Needs Assessment/Program
Planning and Program Timelines are additional recommended documents for LEAs
with participating private/non-public schools.
These documents can be located at http://www.mde.k12.ms.us/innovative_support/TitleIBasic_private_school.html. Please note: All LEAs are required to
obtain counts for private/non-public school students
from low-income families as of April 30
annually.
The following topics must be discussed during the ongoing
consultation process:
·
how the LEA will identify the needs of eligible private
school children;
·
what services the LEA will offer to eligible private
school children;
·
how and when the LEA will make decisions about the
delivery of services;
·
how, where and by whom the LEA will provide services to
eligible private school children, including a thorough consideration and
analysis of the views of the private school officials on the provision of
services through a contract with a third-party provider;
·
how the LEA will assess academically, the services
eligible private school children receive in accordance with §200.10 and how the
LEA will use the results of that assessment to improve Title I services;
·
the size and scope of the equitable services that the LEA
will provide to eligible private school children and in accordance with
§200.64, and the process used to proportion the funds and determine the amount
of funds that will be allocated to provide these services;
·
the method or sources of best available data that the LEA
and the private school officials will use under §200.78 to determine the number
of private school children from low-income families residing in participating
public school attendance areas;
·
the equitable services the LEA will provide to teachers
and families of participating private school children;
·
the provision of a copy of the Title I application to
private school officials, if requested;
·
if the LEA disagrees with the views of the private school
officials on the provisions of services through a contract, the LEA must
provide the private school with the reasons, in writing, as to why the LEA
chooses not to use a contractor.
Participation Information (Check
the appropriate box.)
|
|
Title I, A Basic q Yes |
Title II, A Teacher Quality q Yes |
Title III English Language Learners q Yes |
Other:
Please List q Yes |
|||
|
(Or) Declining Services |
x No |
x No |
x No |
x No |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Name of Public School Official Name of Public School Official |
Name of Private School
Administrator |
|
|||||
|
Trey Allman |
Robert D. Hill |
|
|||||
|
Public School Official Signature |
Date Signed |
Private School Administrator Signature |
Date Signed |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Local Educational Agency
(LEA) |
Private School Name |
|
|||||
|
Water Valley Schools |
|
|
|||||
Title I Plan
Districtwide
BUDGET NARRATIVE
District:
Davidson Elementary/Water Valley
Schools
Indicate the use of funds.
The following categories should be used: Supplies,
Travel, Contractual, Salaries/Benefits, Administration, Equipment, and Other. Use the description column to detail the
computations used to arrive at the total amount indicated for each
category. This information should
include a detailed description of the costs and a clear, concise description of
the computations used to arrive at the total amounts indicated. A sample budget is provided on the previous
page. Expenditures should reflect cost district wide (to include Central
Office and all schools).
|
CATEGORY |
AMOUNT |
DESCRIPTION |
|
SUPPLIES/PROPERTY |
20,377 & 23,466 |
Purchase
paper, supplies, supplemental student materials, workbooks, computers and
educational software. |
|
SUMMER SCHOOL PROGRAM /After School Program |
20,000 20,000 |
6
teacher salaries @ 12,000/benefits 2,494 classroom supplies = 5,506 / 6 teachers, 27 weeks, 3 hrs. per week = 14,800 salary + 5,200 supplies |
|
CONTRACTUAL/Teacher Improvement |
21,134 |
JBHM
Ed Group will be contracted for 1,500 per day for District Wide Teacher
Improvement for 12 days = $18,000.
$3,134 will be used for travel/fees. |
|
SALARIES / BENEFITS |
294,766 20,000 |
3
classroom size
reduction teachers in grades 2,4, and 6 and 1 counselor. 4
Teacher
assistants / 50% salary of Registered Nurse for
Davidson El. |
|
ADMINISTRATION |
65,030 |
50%
salary for 1 clerical position & 50% salary of federal programs director |
|
Reedy Acres (N & D) |
14,778 |
Tutors,
student fees technology, and classroom supplies. |
|
OTHER |
5,000 100 |
5,000
for Communicare to offset cost for students that don’t qualify for
Medicaid. 100 for Homeless identified
at our High School. |
Total 484,651
Title I, Part A,
Neglected
Activities and Expenditures
An
LEA that receives Title I, Part A funds for Neglected children must provide
services to children that reside in their Local attendance area and are defined
as “neglected.” If applicable, each LEA
must provide below specific descriptions and costs of proposed activities in
the following approved categories as defined by Section 1112(b)(1)(E)(ii) and Section 1424.
|
Allowable Category |
Proposed Activity |
Cost |
|
Tutoring Activities |
|
7,798 |
|
Alcohol and Drug Counseling |
|
|
|
Evaluation of
health and social services designed to improve the likelihood that
at-risk students will complete their education |
|
|
|
Special activities to meet the unique needs of
participating students (i.e. Speech Therapist, and/or Anger Management) |
|
|
|
Activities for mentoring and peer mediation |
|
|
|
Career Counseling |
|
|
|
Supplies and Materials |
15 students x $100 =1,500 (paper, pens, notebooks
etc.) $3,500 for lab fees, workbooks, classroom project
materials |
4,500 |
|
Other (please describe) |
Property such as calculators, ink, and learning
software |
2,480 |
|
TOTAL MUST EQUAL Allocation for Neglected
Services: (The
Neglected allocation is a portion of the total Title I, Part A allocation) |
14,778 |
|
Title II, Part A –
Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting
Must
be fully completed. (A response is
required to each item whether or not Title II, Part A funds are used to
implement the activity. Use
additional sheet(s) if necessary)
Parental and Staff Needs Assessment Survey reveals
most helpful to students:
·
Reduced class
size
·
Tutorial
programs
Parental and Staff Needs Assessment Survey reveals
instructional areas most important:
Common Core standards in:
·
Reading/Language Arts
·
Math
|
Grade |
Before Reduction Teacher |
After Reduction Teacher |
|
Kindergarten |
|
|
|
First |
|
1:18.6 |
|
Third |
|
|
·
To help create
effective instruction, one teacher in Kindergarten, 1st and 3rd
grades will be hired to reduce class size. Smaller class size will allow
teachers too successfully address differences in learning styles while
delivering the
·
Analyses of
available data, such as state test scores and teacher-made assessments revealed
a need for continued technical assistance in curriculum alignment and
development/revision of the district’s test item bank.
The professional development activities are aligned
with the challenging State standards, which require that each school meet
performance expectations in achievement and growth annually. Success or failure
is measured annually through a statewide assessment program. Meeting these standards requires teachers who
are skilled in effective instructional strategies and students who are have
mastered course content and effective test-
Teachers
reviewed research in grade level meetings that related to scientifically based
strategies and concluded that information supported district strategy to reduce
class size and increased effective instruction. An example of the research can
be found in J.D. Finn and C.M. Acilles’ Answers
and Questions about Class Size. This article describes “a large-scale
experiment in which kindergarten students and teachers were randomly assigned
to small and large classes within each participating school. Students remained
in these classes for 2 years. At the end of each grade they were measured in
reading and mathematics by standardized and curriculum-based test. The results
are definitive: (a) a significant benefit accrues to students to students in
reduced-size classes in both subject areas and (b) there is evidence that
minority students in particular benefit from the smaller class environment,
especially when curriculum-based tests are used as the leaning criteria. A
longitudinal analysis of a portion of the sample indicated that students in
small classes out perform their peers in kindergarten classes of regular size
and also gain more in reading outcomes during second year.”
Title I, Title
II Title VI and local funds provide class size reduction teachers in grades K,
1st, 2nd, 3rd.
5th, ,and 6th. Class size reduction along with scientific
based programs such as Accelerated
No Title II funds are used for professional development. 100% goes to salary.
All of Title II funds are allocated
to class size reduction. However, 5% of Title I funds as well as district funds
are set aside for professional development that is based on scientific research
and is ongoing. Provide a description of the professional development
activities that will be made available to teachers and principals under Title
II, Part A and how the LEA will ensure that the professional development needs
of teachers and principals will be met using the Title II, Part A funds.
Any remaining funds (after salaries and benefits) will provide professional development of teachers and principals. Teacher Staff Development Needs Survey’s reveal
· How to Implement Positive Behavioral Intervention
· Practical Classroom Management
·
Language, Math, and Reading Workshops
No Title II funds are used for professional development. 100% goes to
salary.
·
Professional development activities that will be
made available to teachers and principals under Title II, Part A, will be
determined through a comprehensive needs assessment in the spring of 2009.
Included in the assessment were (1) surveys, (2) analyses of test scores, (3)
formal/informal teacher/administrator evaluation records, and (4) MSIS
print-outs of teacher certification and assignment.
·
To ensure that the professional development
activities meet the needs of teachers and principals, participants will
evaluate consultant presentations following the session or activity, and after
using the activities in their classroom, teachers will discuss their experience
using the strategy.
No Title II funds are used for professional development. 100% goes to salary.
The Needs
Assessment is based on the analysis of test scores formal/informal
administration evaluations and MSIS printouts of teacher certification and
assignments.
· How to Implement Positive Behavioral Intervention
· Practical Classroom Management
· Language, Math, and Reading Workshops
· Motivation and team building
· Differentiated Instruction
· Modification of Instruction in Regular Classroom
To insure that professional development activities meet the needs of teachers and principals, weekly meetings are held. Strategies and experiences are discussed and evaluated.
As a part of the
comprehensive needs assessment parent and teacher/staff surveys were conducted
to gather data. A parent involvement meeting was conducted and the plan for
Title II was discussed and suggestions for improvements were sought. Teachers,
paraprofessionals, principals, other school personnel, and parents serve on the
Schoolwide Planning Committee. The Committee provides valuable input for all
school educational plans.
Implementing Positive Behavior will help improve student behavior in the classroom
All professional development is funded with Title I and district funds. All administrators, teachers, and paraprofessionals at Davidson Elementary are highly qualified.
100% of Title II
funds pay salary.
|
|
Date of Submission: / / / |
|
|
|
Effective Date of the
Transfer: / / /
|
|
|
LEA Transferability
Authority For State Formula Grants
under Title II, Part A and Title II, Part D of the Elementary And
Secondary Education Act as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
|
||
|
Name of Local Educational
Agency (LEA) submitting this notice: |
||
|
Address: |
||
|
Person to contact about
this notice: Name: |
||
|
Telephone: |
||
|
Fax: |
||
|
e-mail: |
||
|
Programs from which funds will be
transferred and to which the funds will be transferred: |
Please check one: From: Title II, Part A To: Title I, Part A Title II, Part D |
|
|
Amount of funds to be transferred: |
$ |
|
|
Federal fiscal year of transferred funds: |
Please circle one: FY 10 11
12 |
|